As a number of states prepare to reevaluate their motorcycle helmet laws, a rapidly growing rift has developed between riders and lawmakers. Many of the state governments in question are pushing for stricter helmet laws under the guise of promoting public safety. A few states are considering modifying laws to leave the decision up to the motorcycle operator. Riders claim that laws forcing them to wear helmets are infringing on their right to make their own decisions regarding personal safety. They understand the risks involved with driving a motorcycle and should be able to make a choice whether or not to strap on a helmet before they ride.
A third party also has a very controversial role in this debate – the insurance companies. Many insurers have been lobbying state governments to require helmets for all motorcycle riders. From their perspective, laws that force bikers to wear helmets may reduce potentially fatal accidents and decrease the overall number of riders on the road. This would obviously save insurers a boat load of cash and increase profits on motorcycle policies. Statistics show that mandatory helmet use would reduce the amount of money being paid out for costly treatments or deaths that are a direct result of motorcycle accidents. Many bikers claim that state lawmakers are doing the bidding of these insurance companies.
Currently, 20 U.S. states require a helmet to be worn at all times. The other 30 states either have no helmet guidelines or lift restrictions once the rider reaches the age of 18 or 21. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics indicate that less than 50% of motorcycle riders fatally injured in accidents were wearing a helmet. It is rather clear that you have a much better chance of surviving an accident if you choose to protect yourself with a helmet.
I can sympathize with the viewpoint of both motorcycle enthusiasts and government officials. Citizens are entitled to their personal rights and should have the ability to make their own choices. If you’re fully prepared to risk injury or death to feel the breeze in your hair, then you should have the option to do so. At the same time, lawmakers have a duty to create guidelines that would clearly enhance the safety of motorcycle riders. I see no problems with this as long as they are acting independently of insurance companies. Motives may need to be questioned if state legislators are receiving kickbacks or campaign contributions from insurers.
Whether or not a rider is forced to wear a helmet in a particular state, one thing is abundantly clear. Statistics show that they can save lives. Is it worth risking everything just to ride without one?
Written by: E. B. Chuong writes articles about recreational vehicles, and outdoor activities. Are you still looking for a good price on Shoei Helmets? It’s no secret Shoei is a popular helmet. Check out our top selling Shoei Multitec helmets today.
No Comments on "Motorcycle Helmet Laws Sacrifice Style For Safety"